<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FeedPass: Did it Pass?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rev2.org/2006/05/22/feedpass-did-it-pass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rev2.org/2006/05/22/feedpass-did-it-pass/</link>
	<description>Profiling Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:41:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PlagiarismToday &#187; Feedpass: A Cause for Conern?</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2006/05/22/feedpass-did-it-pass/comment-page-1/#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>PlagiarismToday &#187; Feedpass: A Cause for Conern?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 23:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/archives/2006/05/22/feedpass-did-it-pass/#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>[...] Many bloggers, uncofortable with the idea of strangers monetizing their content, began to rail on the service. One blogger, Mark Evans, referred to the service as &quot;Vultures&quot; and others chimed in with less than flattering views on the service. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Many bloggers, uncofortable with the idea of strangers monetizing their content, began to rail on the service. One blogger, Mark Evans, referred to the service as &quot;Vultures&quot; and others chimed in with less than flattering views on the service. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
