Rev2.org

  • All
  • Featured
  • Podcast
  • News & Acquisitions
  • Products & Services
  • Trends & Analysis
  • Miscellaneous
    RSS
  • Advertise
  • Archives
  • About
  • Contact

Exclusive Launch Preview: Litepost – A New Generation of E-mail

By Rev2 Team    July 9th, 2007
9 Comments

Litepost logoLitepost is a new startup that aims to re-invent e-mail. Rev2 had the exclusive opportunity to speak with its Product Manager, Nathan Braun, prior to the company’s invite-only launch of the service. The company, focused mainly on e-mail, plans to revolutionize the industry through its simplistic interface and viral potential.

Aiming High
As it stands, Litepost is not available to the public. The service currently offers up a well-designed landing page with sparse information about their upcoming product. After an in-depth tour with members of the Litepost staff and the opportunity to beta test the application myself, I can tell you it’s rather different from most e-mail applications I’ve used in the past. Iin fact, Nathan Braun, Litepost’s Senior Product Manager, noted that they hope the product will end up being “the perfect merge of the fewest yet most valuable features of Yahoo! Mail and GMail.” The company still, however, has many decisions to make in their quest for e-mail domination.

Beta

Litepost’s Login Screen

Nothing But the Basics
Initially, Litepost plans to market themselves on simplicity. As it stands, the application is stunningly beautiful and a dream to use for novice internet surfers. It reminds me of using Mac OSX’s Mail application: gorgeous, yet functional. Claims Braun, “as long as users understand our interface, I’m sure they’ll like it.” Luckily for Litepost, that won’t be so hard for users to do. The interface, unlike lots of new Web 2.0 e-mail applications, is not coded in AJAX. After a brief discussion, Braun conceded that the company really hadn’t planned on how to incorporate AJAX, theorizing that it may be included in future editions of Litepost.

Sticking to Simplicity
The coding dilemma is due to several problems Litepost has been dealing with. An influx of hits from third-world countries has led them to believe that Litepost will be the ideal webmail choice for users with low-bandwidth. Coding the application in AJAX would essentially leave these individuals out of Litepost’s userbase. If they were to offer two versions, it would segment the Litepost userbase similar to how Yahoo! has segmented theirs with the recent Mail Beta. Litepost expresses no intention to do so, and claims they’ll find an amicable solution to the dilemma, ensuring that the service will be “reliable, durable, rugged, nostalgic, old-fashioned” for all of its users.

Accordingly, they plan on nailing the first interface after response and feedback from beta testers, then possibly “AJAXing” it. Litepost is quick to point out that they’ll be more responsive to user feedback than almost any company before them.

Composing in Litepost

Composing an E-Mail in Litepost

Interface Customization
For the moment, Litepost’s beta interface isn’t quite what version 1.0 of the application will look like. Braun claims Litepost’s new interface “will pay off more–for everyone,” although the current interface is a dream to use. The company claims they’re trying to do for e-mail what 37Signals did for project management: simplify and beautify it. As such, the original aim of Litepost is to be “clutter-free, bare-bones, frill-free, [and] feature-free.”

Litepost offers up numerous skins for users to utilize, all well-designed and uniform throughout Litepost’s interface. Coming soon, however, will be a user-customizable version of Litepost, with the option for users to upload their own themes. The process won’t be difficult, believes Braun. In our discussion, he was curious why other applications haven’t yet made their applications similarly customizable. After all, Firefox hackers are using Greasemonkey to change the interfaces to their favorite sites. Why not make it easier for them?

Litepost Sofia

Litepost’s Sofia Skin, One of Many Skins Offered by the Service

Merging E-Mail With Simplicity
Besides providing a simple e-mail interface, Litepost gives users several additional features that haven’t really been present on other webmail solutions. Similar to GMail, the service offers to merge e-mails into selected conversations. To avoid being labeled as a GMail competitor, however, Litepost instead forces the user to manually merge conversations, which is both a blessing and a cause of despair. While GMail makes mistakes, it’s generally easier when the e-mail application categorizes your webmail for you. Litepost allows you to categorize e-mails with merging, but it’s all up to the user.

The application also makes extensive use of rating and tagging. Users can tag each e-mail and then they’re able to categorize e-mails from there with tags. Ratings are done on a five-star scale and users can search their e-mail with those ratings as well. Finally, the search system has been implemented so users can narrow down their searches using numerous fields. Braun gave a specific example: “it allows you to see messages grouped by DATE first, then SENDER.” He went on to note that Litepost believes this solution is “more intelligent” than GMail’s automerge, a feature which Litepost plans to implement in the near future.

Ratings

Litepost’s E-Mail Rating Option (Circled)

Open Source Options
Throughout their entire development process, Litepost has vowed to remain completely free and open source software. They plan on offering Litepost as a server-side solution for webmasters as well, possibly through a Jumpbox, should they reach an agreement with the company (despite some negotiation, it doesn’t look like Jumpbox will agree to work with Litepost). They’ve also looked into combining the server-side solution of Litepost with the already released Roundcube.

Braun has spoken to Matt Mullenweg, founder of WordPress, about utilizing the open source approach to further Litepost. His solution is to “get away with ‘just’ offering a premium hosted version/service…just like WodPress and many many others…while keeping the current/initial/basic Litepost product…open source.” Braun said Litepost will look to open source to help them with faster evolution and possibly adoption, similar to WordPress’s strategy against Google’s Blogger.

The Future of All Mail?
Litepost has big plans for their future. At several points in our conversation, Braun alluded to his hope that Litepost would at some point “ultimately overtake GMail and all the other mail services over the medium- to longterm.” The company’s current product is a simple, easy-to-use, webmail application that can be utilized by internet novices, experts, and those without access to high-bandwidth. Braun noted that Litepost had a lot in the pipeline, including a flurry of other communication formats. In the works, claimed Braun, are “integrated voicemail, fax, and postal mail integration.” Unfortunately, Braun wasn’t able to offer any further commentary.

Litepost Options

Litepost’s Current Options, Only a Shadow of What’s to Come

The company’s efforts to finance themselves will surely be bolstered by their planned future in different fields of communications. Until Litepost reaches the point when they are able to offer convergence of fax, telephone, and e-mail, they will attempt to utilize premium accounts to aid their financial situation. Their final interface isn’t finished yet, but Litepost plans to have something concrete finished at some point over the summer. At that point, the service will open to the public and begin offering normal accounts with the Litepost features available now, and professional accounts with the inclusion of other communications formats and advanced Litepost features.

Omittances
As I mentioned earlier, Litepost, as it stands, is a bare-bones internet product. GMail users have access to Google Talk and IM through the application itself, while other e-mail applications allow users the ability to read RSS feeds. If a consumer is looking for a place to bring all of their online activities together, Litepost is not that hub. In the future, Braun hints that the application may begin to include RSS and IM.

Finishing Touches
The company has a long way to go, and they seem to have their goals set high. Braun thinks that “Microsoft and Google and Yahoo should all be awfully embarrassed that they did not come up with 90% of this stuff.” Furthermore, the company may be slightly delusioned in claiming that GMail has a “horrible, arrogant interface and aesthetic.” Still, compared to Litepost, most webmail services today are unnecessarily complicated. For those who don’t need the complication and intense features, Braun says Litepost will provide “straightforward, simple e-mail and nothing else.” Litepost has been careful to ensure that our audience realized that the current product was not representative of their final product. The screenshots shown within this article are simply of the 0.5 product and are may or may not be included in the final 1.0 revision. Regardless, the screenshots should show the potential of Litepost as an easy-to-use web application for all web surfers. While the company may be off the mark a bit with some of its claims, one can only hope that dozens of companies will follow their lead in an attempt to make the web easier to use for everyone.

Related Posts

  • Are Social Games Losing Their Lustre?
  • Zoho Launches Zoho DB, Beats Others To The Game
  • Fmail: Access Gmail from Your Facebook Account
  • Camille

    I remember that website! I was very curious to see what it could do. Thanks for this great review, I really can’t wait to try it.
    I don’t find a rating of emails very useful though. But if Litepost could include RSS, that would be great! And it looks very pretty too, I use Gmail and even I never had any problems, it’s very ugly and plain.

  • http://www.howtowakeupearly.com Wake Up

    “taking over GMail” is ummm… a bit overrated

  • http://www.realityequation.net livatlantis

    The Litepost team seems to heavily inspired by Apple’s sense of aesthetic and design. I’ve signed up to receive information about version 1 — I was a huge mail clients fan, having tested everything from Pegasus Mail to Eudora, to The Bat!, Merlin, Outlook Express, Mail.app, nPOP — so let’s see how this one aims to take a bite off Gmail.

    This quote in their website is significant, I think:
    “Ideal for small businesses and workgroups, the Litepost Webmail Server provides even more flexibility and security, as all of your messages reside on your own servers.”

    Their open source approach to making the server software available to all suggests that corporate mail and in-house software are big targets for them to deploy their technology. I’ve always felt the “enterprise” side of computing has always been terribly unapproachable (that, however, might be so more IT folks keep their jobs), but using Litepost in that environment would make sense. Of course, security would have to be tight (funny there should be another post in Rev2 about Google and postini).

    Of course, I’d always encourage fledgling new web startups; you never know what might be the next big thing (which reminds me, I need to get back to Malcolm Gladwell’s ‘The Tipping Point’). Threatening Google and Yahoo!’s strongholds will be difficult and will probably require more than just a new approach and a nice interface, but it’s certainly encouraging that there are those out there who are driven to try.

  • Brandon Bean

    I shall never give up my Gmail.

  • Brad

    Everybody likes to throw around the 37signals name/model these days. But their “opinionated software” and “fewer features” ideas may not encourage such ideas as multi-dimensional search, etc. How does “simpler” software square up with the statement that “Microsoft and Google and Yahoo should all be awfully embarrassed that they did not come up with 90% of this stuffâ€?? It sounds like they’re adding features, not taking away.

    Now don’t get me wrong — simplicity is good, but better is the idea that an application should present itself simply to the new user, but have more complicated and interesting features for advanced users. Perhaps these features won’t be as obviously simple on the front end, but if they are available as a user digs into the app, it will be all the better. If Litepost is able to present a simple interface on the front end, yet also allow some of these more interesting, advanced features (found in the 90% mentioned above) to be accessible to the advanced users, it could be a great app.

    Another thing upcoming E-mail applications might want to consider is workflow. There are so many different E-mail applications out there, but none that I know of actually advocate a particular, efficient workflow. Should E-mails remain in the inbox, or should they be archived? Should they be tagged in a particular way, or in a free-form way? If application designers spent as much time designing workflow as they do designing features, applications might become much more powerful. Yes, you risk alienating a few users by providing a workflow they don’t like… but you would gain more fans than detractors, if it were done correctly. These are the kinds of decisions 37signals always seems to advocate: it’s not just about features, it’s about opinionated software. LitePost, what are your opinions? Don’t just gie me another “archive” button to use or not use. Make me think about my workflow.

    Another thing to consider: how do people actually use your app? For instance, I know many people who use Gmail to keep track of their TODO items, simply by E-mailing themselves; wouldn’t it be nice, given this fact, if Gmail allowed for the creation of TODO items directly in the inbox, instead of forcing the user to E-mail herself? Or what if the app allowed users to edit subject lines of E-mails found in the inbox, so they can add their own notations about whatever actions need to be taken? Of how about allowing the user to drag and drop E-mails in the inbox to sort them? Things like this aren’t that hard to come up with, but nobody is doing them. Don’t just make another E-mail app. Help me be productive!

    Here’s hoping that LitePost has a simple front end that gets more advanced along with the user, has a workflow in mind, and really understands the way its users make use of the app. If they do these things, they just might be successful.

  • http://www.realityequation.net/ livatlantis

    Brad, your workflow argument makes a lot of sense to me. Although there is that call of nostalgia where email messages were just that, I do think that what I was looking for when reviewing all those clients was a better, newer approach to email. I thought Opera’s M2 client was a major breakthrough; suddenly, we didn’t have folders. Better still, we didn’t need them. Their “conversations” and “filters” approach — eventually popularized by Gmail, although I don’t really use the feature much, thanks to their awesome search — was, IMHO, revolutionary. A quiet revolution, but a revolution nonetheless.

    We’re all looking for a better ways of doing things. And yes,

    better != array {
    featurepacked;
    featurestipped;
    simpleton-istic;
    any.one.thing;
    }

    I know I say this a lot but (it’s such a nice analogy), the iPod didn’t compete with or join other digital audio players. The market was saturated — not unlike the free email service market, although we have giant oligopolistic players — but they simply chose to carve out a new market. And yes, workflow (or in the case of the iPod, “clickwheelization”) was key. Interface. Human. Organic, perhaps.

    (Thanks for that excellent post, Brad; got me thinking…)

  • http://www.rev2.org/2007/07/14/this-week-on-rev2-twor-ending-14th-july-2007/ This Week on Rev2 (TWOR) – Ending 14th July, 2007 – Rev2.org

    [...] Exclusive Launch Preview: Litepost – A New Generation of E-mail [...]

  • http://quetzal.over-blog.org Pierre

    Using simple or advanced application has always been a dilemna to me. We could express the pros and cons of simple vs. advanced this way :

    Simple application :
    * fast use : get things done rapidly, in no more time than you need to go to the core of the action
    * simple (not complicated) : no time lost in understanding how to do complex tasks

    A good advanced application :
    * packed with useful features, you may not need initially, but will soon be useful as you learn about them
    * let’s you solve issues such as : classification (for instance of your messages), customization to you or your client’s taste

    Advanced applications make a difference when they can be handled both by beginners and advanced users.
    This means that the basic features are at the core front, and not hidden by the advanced perhaps more compelxe features.

    Email is the most popular application on the Internet. So, many users may want and are familiar with some advanced features (such as priority, classification in folders, etc.). Good email applications (and they are many, either webmail-based or desktop-based) can be handled in thirty seconds for a simple urgent message, and with more specifications for messages you want to classify, customize, etc.

    This is why, though Litepost may be great for some users, it may seem to basic for users, including me.

  • Charlie

    Litepost is a farce! They have no contact information on their website. The Who Is information for their URL is anonymous. They have no business model yet, and they have no advertising engine. Perhaps their server installed package is decent, but they have no screenshots ans the ones above really don’t show much. Unless they start to disclose who they are anybody who would use this service would be nuts

  • http://mail.litepost.com/ Alex

    Although Litepost is supposedly in invitation-only beta, I was just able to create a new account. Out of curiosity, I decided to see if there was anything interesting at mail.litepost.com. Sure enough, there’s a login/registration form, even though it’s not linked from their homepage yet.

    Enjoy! ;)

  • http://www.metrocarinsure.com/carsinsurancepolicygraindealersinbeaumonttexas4runnerclaims.html visit now

    I admire you on the willingness to share this info with others – good luck!

About Rev2.org

Rev2.org is a weblog dedicated to profiling the best web apps & services and tracking new emerging trends in this space. More..

Sponsors

Subscribe

  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Add to Google Reader
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to Pageflakes
  • RSS

Submit a startup

Send us a tip

Write for us

Sponsor us

Internal Search
Web Hosting
Website Optimization
Web Hosting
Best Web Hosts
SEO
UK Web Hosting
Web Design
Cheap Hosting
Web Development
Cheap Web Hosting
Social Networks

© 2005-2012 Rev2.org