<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Saves You Money with Live Search Cashback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rev2.org/2008/05/21/microsoft-saves-you-money-with-live-search-cashback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/05/21/microsoft-saves-you-money-with-live-search-cashback/</link>
	<description>Profiling Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/05/21/microsoft-saves-you-money-with-live-search-cashback/comment-page-1/#comment-166916</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=1782#comment-166916</guid>
		<description>If the play of color in   2011 to brand the most out of color, then   the sub-brand of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marcjacobs-handbags.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Marc   Jacobs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marcjacobs-handbags.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Marc by Marc   Jacobs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; must come   first, no matter the   color, style, are fresh and vibrant, people feel   very cute, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marcjacobs-handbags.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Marc Jacobs   bags&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marcjacobs-handbags.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Marc by Marc   Jacobs Handbags&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; are you   like and talk   about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the play of color in   2011 to brand the most out of color, then   the sub-brand of <a href="http://www.marcjacobs-handbags.org/" rel="nofollow"><strong>Marc   Jacobs</strong></a> and <a href="http://www.marcjacobs-handbags.org/" rel="nofollow"><strong>Marc by Marc   Jacobs</strong></a> must come   first, no matter the   color, style, are fresh and vibrant, people feel   very cute, <a href="http://www.marcjacobs-handbags.org/" rel="nofollow"><strong>Marc Jacobs   bags</strong></a> or <a href="http://www.marcjacobs-handbags.org/" rel="nofollow"><strong>Marc by Marc   Jacobs Handbags</strong></a> are you   like and talk   about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/05/21/microsoft-saves-you-money-with-live-search-cashback/comment-page-1/#comment-153795</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=1782#comment-153795</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s different from Google Checkout because MS is not trying to compete with Paypal and Ebay. Google&#039;s focus was not on searching and products, but on building a competitor to Paypal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s different from Google Checkout because MS is not trying to compete with Paypal and Ebay. Google&#39;s focus was not on searching and products, but on building a competitor to Paypal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loupaglia</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/05/21/microsoft-saves-you-money-with-live-search-cashback/comment-page-1/#comment-153794</link>
		<dc:creator>loupaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=1782#comment-153794</guid>
		<description>All about MSFT using the capabilities of the acquisition wisely but I find myself not feeling this is the &quot;big&quot; announcement (which is not a good thing if it is).  How is this different really than the Google Checkout incentive through search of a year ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All about MSFT using the capabilities of the acquisition wisely but I find myself not feeling this is the &#8220;big&#8221; announcement (which is not a good thing if it is).  How is this different really than the Google Checkout incentive through search of a year ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/05/21/microsoft-saves-you-money-with-live-search-cashback/comment-page-1/#comment-141080</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=1782#comment-141080</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s different from Google Checkout because MS is not trying to compete with Paypal and Ebay. Google&#039;s focus was not on searching and products, but on building a competitor to Paypal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s different from Google Checkout because MS is not trying to compete with Paypal and Ebay. Google&#39;s focus was not on searching and products, but on building a competitor to Paypal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loupaglia</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/05/21/microsoft-saves-you-money-with-live-search-cashback/comment-page-1/#comment-141079</link>
		<dc:creator>loupaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=1782#comment-141079</guid>
		<description>All about MSFT using the capabilities of the acquisition wisely but I find myself not feeling this is the &quot;big&quot; announcement (which is not a good thing if it is).  How is this different really than the Google Checkout incentive through search of a year ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All about MSFT using the capabilities of the acquisition wisely but I find myself not feeling this is the &#8220;big&#8221; announcement (which is not a good thing if it is).  How is this different really than the Google Checkout incentive through search of a year ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/05/21/microsoft-saves-you-money-with-live-search-cashback/comment-page-1/#comment-138354</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 11:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=1782#comment-138354</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s different from Google Checkout because MS is not trying to compete with Paypal and Ebay. Google&#039;s focus was not on searching and products, but on building a competitor to Paypal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s different from Google Checkout because MS is not trying to compete with Paypal and Ebay. Google&#8217;s focus was not on searching and products, but on building a competitor to Paypal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loupaglia</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/05/21/microsoft-saves-you-money-with-live-search-cashback/comment-page-1/#comment-138353</link>
		<dc:creator>loupaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 09:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=1782#comment-138353</guid>
		<description>All about MSFT using the capabilities of the acquisition wisely but I find myself not feeling this is the &quot;big&quot; announcement (which is not a good thing if it is).  How is this different really than the Google Checkout incentive through search of a year ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All about MSFT using the capabilities of the acquisition wisely but I find myself not feeling this is the &#8220;big&#8221; announcement (which is not a good thing if it is).  How is this different really than the Google Checkout incentive through search of a year ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

