<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The FTC&#8217;s Blogging Rules Are Blatant Favoritism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rev2.org/2010/02/03/the-ftcs-blogging-rules-are-blatant-favoritism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rev2.org/2010/02/03/the-ftcs-blogging-rules-are-blatant-favoritism/</link>
	<description>Profiling Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: supra vaider</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2010/02/03/the-ftcs-blogging-rules-are-blatant-favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-168519</link>
		<dc:creator>supra vaider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=3467#comment-168519</guid>
		<description>Perhaps this is one of the most interesting blogs that I have ever seen. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this is one of the most interesting blogs that I have ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2010/02/03/the-ftcs-blogging-rules-are-blatant-favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-163281</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=3467#comment-163281</guid>
		<description>So, who told you life is fair? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Remember what George Orwell said in &quot;Animal Farm&quot;?  &quot;All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then there is the quote, &quot;I used to cry that I had on shoes til I met a man that had no feet.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rather than whine about what someone else has create it for your self. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does it really matter what someone else has? That&#039;s just LIFE, deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, who told you life is fair? </p>
<p>Remember what George Orwell said in &#8220;Animal Farm&#8221;?  &#8220;All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then there is the quote, &#8220;I used to cry that I had on shoes til I met a man that had no feet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rather than whine about what someone else has create it for your self. </p>
<p>Does it really matter what someone else has? That&#39;s just LIFE, deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2010/02/03/the-ftcs-blogging-rules-are-blatant-favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-163279</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=3467#comment-163279</guid>
		<description>Who paid the FTC what, or how much, to get that ruling? Or who paid what to whom inside the FTC to influence that ruling? Corpocracy: the shadow government of these United States of America. Follow the money...you&#039;ll find &#039;the rules?&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who paid the FTC what, or how much, to get that ruling? Or who paid what to whom inside the FTC to influence that ruling? Corpocracy: the shadow government of these United States of America. Follow the money&#8230;you&#39;ll find &#39;the rules?&#39;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mkhall</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2010/02/03/the-ftcs-blogging-rules-are-blatant-favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-163275</link>
		<dc:creator>mkhall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=3467#comment-163275</guid>
		<description>@TheDudeDean -- Perhaps Twitter could require that people participating in Tweet-for-pay programs or otherwise receiving freebies must check a box on their account indicating this, similar to the &quot;Verified Account&quot; flag. Then  &quot;Paid&quot; could be appended to their account name, indicating &quot;follower beware.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@dorizinn -- While ~we~ know that media dinners are free, not all your readers will. A case can be made for requiring some kind of legalese boilerplate on blogs, with relevant posts simply linking to the boilerplate via standardized text. That way it won&#039;t get in the way of the writing, but will still educate the public and satisfy the FTC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TheDudeDean &#8212; Perhaps Twitter could require that people participating in Tweet-for-pay programs or otherwise receiving freebies must check a box on their account indicating this, similar to the &#8220;Verified Account&#8221; flag. Then  &#8220;Paid&#8221; could be appended to their account name, indicating &#8220;follower beware.&#8221;</p>
<p>@dorizinn &#8212; While ~we~ know that media dinners are free, not all your readers will. A case can be made for requiring some kind of legalese boilerplate on blogs, with relevant posts simply linking to the boilerplate via standardized text. That way it won&#39;t get in the way of the writing, but will still educate the public and satisfy the FTC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheDudeDean</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2010/02/03/the-ftcs-blogging-rules-are-blatant-favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-163274</link>
		<dc:creator>TheDudeDean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=3467#comment-163274</guid>
		<description>Yeah how about those paid for Celeb tweets?  How is Kim Kardashian supposed to say this is a paid for tweet in under 140 characters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah how about those paid for Celeb tweets?  How is Kim Kardashian supposed to say this is a paid for tweet in under 140 characters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dorizinn</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2010/02/03/the-ftcs-blogging-rules-are-blatant-favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-163273</link>
		<dc:creator>dorizinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=3467#comment-163273</guid>
		<description>I think as a journalist and blogger, it&#039;s just ethical to disclose that I have received the anything for free. I have, like when Bonefish Grill rolled out their new menu and invited me to it: &lt;a href=&quot;http://fatkidsclub.com/?p=188&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://fatkidsclub.com/?p=188&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You may not have to say &quot;free&quot; so blatantly. Like here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/cleanplatecharlie/2009/11/sampling_ra_sushis_new_menu.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/cleanplatecha...&lt;/a&gt; I said &quot;media dinner.&quot; I&#039;ve never been to a &quot;media dinner&quot; that *wasn&#039;t* free, so I feel that was disclosure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am irked that radio personalities - South Florida based and otherwise - don&#039;t disclose their freebies. I&#039;ve always believed that this was a problem and if bloggers have rules (which they rightfully should), than the rest of the media should follow suit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I could care less about celebrities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think as a journalist and blogger, it&#39;s just ethical to disclose that I have received the anything for free. I have, like when Bonefish Grill rolled out their new menu and invited me to it: <a href="http://fatkidsclub.com/?p=188" rel="nofollow">http://fatkidsclub.com/?p=188</a></p>
<p>You may not have to say &#8220;free&#8221; so blatantly. Like here: <a href="http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/cleanplatecharlie/2009/11/sampling_ra_sushis_new_menu.php" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/cleanplatecha.." rel="nofollow">http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/cleanplatecha..</a>. I said &#8220;media dinner.&#8221; I&#39;ve never been to a &#8220;media dinner&#8221; that *wasn&#39;t* free, so I feel that was disclosure.</p>
<p>I am irked that radio personalities &#8211; South Florida based and otherwise &#8211; don&#39;t disclose their freebies. I&#39;ve always believed that this was a problem and if bloggers have rules (which they rightfully should), than the rest of the media should follow suit.</p>
<p>I could care less about celebrities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mkhall</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2010/02/03/the-ftcs-blogging-rules-are-blatant-favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-163271</link>
		<dc:creator>mkhall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=3467#comment-163271</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think ALL advertising should carry a disclaimer: &quot;This is marketing and/or promotional material, and should be assumed to be misleading. Do not base decisions on this material.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But that&#039;s just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think ALL advertising should carry a disclaimer: &#8220;This is marketing and/or promotional material, and should be assumed to be misleading. Do not base decisions on this material.&#8221;</p>
<p>But that&#39;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mkhall</title>
		<link>http://www.rev2.org/2010/02/03/the-ftcs-blogging-rules-are-blatant-favoritism/comment-page-1/#comment-163270</link>
		<dc:creator>mkhall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rev2.org/?p=3467#comment-163270</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think ALL advertising should carry a disclaimer: &quot;This is marketing and/or promotional material, and should be assumed to be misleading. Do not base decisions on this material.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But that&#039;s just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think ALL advertising should carry a disclaimer: &#8220;This is marketing and/or promotional material, and should be assumed to be misleading. Do not base decisions on this material.&#8221;</p>
<p>But that&#39;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

