Facebook’s Easter Egg Contra and Apps That Show Profit

There’s two things to remember about Easter eggs: they’re usually hidden in plain sight and they often have goodies in them.

By now, most already know that the Contra Code will create a screen flare effect in Facebook.  If you didn’t know this, you should try it.  Log into Facebook and use the Konami code: up up down down left right left right b a (enter).  Now wherever your mouse is on the screen will have a flare.  Fun!

facebook_easter_egg_610x361

To see the Contra Code in action on Facebook without using it on your account, go check out the short video posted by AllFacebook.com on their blog.

There are other Easter eggs on Facebook that aren’t as well known too.

One is the pirate language filter.  Go to your language options (usually bottom-left, under the Applications tab; or under Settings-Language, top right).  Sure enough, a Pirate Language option is there.  This ads a lot of “Arrrg” and “ye mateys” to your screen.

Another is hidden text, which is found all over the site.  This is the “white on white” text that used to be used by spammers in the old days to hide massive numbers of search keywords on the page to boost rankings.  On Facebook, they’re usually funny axioms.  Pick a friend and go to their friends list, then scroll down to the white space separator between the page navigation list.  Highlight that white space.  Quails with the what now?

For a more thorough look at Facebook Easter eggs and apps, check out the Easter Egg area on Mashable.

mob1

Amazingly, all this fun and excitement is even profitable.  Well, maybe the Easter eggs aren’t specifically, but Facebook itself and even the game makers who create the little Facebook plugin games are showing profit.  Facebook on its own is well on its way towards a $500 million revenue year.  The little games that plug into it (like the ever-popular Mob Wars) are set to do the same too.

VentureBeat is reporting that between them, the little apps on Facebook like Mob Wars, Texas Hold’Em Poker, etc. are poised to pull in about half a billion in revenue this year.  That’s not insignificant, especially given that most people view these games as mere gimmicks and “codes of love.”  Turns out, they’re pretty big business.

Hopefully this doesn’t mean that Facebook will become inundated with them like Myspace has.  Or at least that these apps don’t take over the site and fill your screen with constant advertising and popups.  That was my main reason for leaving Myspace.  Apparently, I’m not alone.

Why There Won’t Be a Google Killer

A search engine which has been making waves in the blogosphere for the last day or two is Cuil (pronounced “cool”). You’ve probably used it twice already, and its random search results (in some cases, the worst ever served by a search engine) do less to serve and more to amaze. I made up my mind this morning to not write about Cuil since I think it had been written about a little too much, but now it hardly seems like it matters.

For you slowpokes, the back story of Cuil is that it was started by a couple ex-Googlers who played a crucial part in what Google search is today, they raised $30 million for the startup and brought on board more Googlers, who have then built a search engine with an index of 125 billion pages (supposedly more than Google’s) and close to 1% relevancy, though no one is judging since it is, literally, their first day on the job.

I think what’s more interesting than the search engine itself, which is like any other “kill Google” new-search-engine-on-the-block, is the question of whether we need another Google, and if it is theoritically possible for someone to create a search engine which has results 25% – 50% better than Google’s and get 1 billion people to switch to it.

Robert Scoble doesn’t think so. He argues, “I still doubt many people would switch. Why? Distribution. Huh? Well, my Firefox browser has Google built into it. Most people have no idea how to switch it. Most people, on our tests, really don’t understand much of anything except that that little box probably now goes to Google. The Google. It’s so pervasive of an expectation at this point that many people type URLs into that box. Or, type the word “Yahoo” into that box so they can get to their email and other Yahoo services. Is Cuil going to be able to get into this game? No way, no how.

I think Scoble is right on the dot, as close-minded as it sounds. Cuil’s problem isn’t relevancy, even given that it has cracked it. Cuil’s problem is distribution. Mass, billion user-level distribution. We like to think that the market place will at all costs reward anything which is better than something else, but I simply don’t think this will be the case should a real Google-killer arrive (and Cuil isn’t it). Instead, here is how I think it will more likely happen:

  • Google killer arrives.
  • Early adopters try it out, like it, have luck with it. Love it.
  • Google killer gets bought by Microsoft and is never to be heard of again, found later as a part of Live.

And that’s the sad and depressing fact of being a 21st century Google-killer. See, when Google took over AltaVista, the situation was very different. Unlike Google, AltaVista sucked. They had cracked probably a 25% relevancy rate, which is close to being the only market option at the time. Google did 50%, eventually people noticed it, and AltaVista is not to be heard of today.

Which brings me to Cuil (or any Google killer’s) problem: Google today is probably about 90% relevant. This means it satisfies probably 90% of people’s searches on the Internet, that is of course, given the appropriate and relevant pages exist. This means, though you may have better search results than Google, Google is going to work 90% of the time regardless of its second-grade search results, and as a result, 90% of the people on this planet have no reason to care about you.

So let’s say a search engine cracks 100%. The result: as long as Google’s relevancy doesn’t degrade over time, or they are overwhelmed somehow by spam overnight, Google ain’t moving. 70%+ search dominance, we’re still alive! This is because of one simple reason: distribution. Google has manage to crack distribution, branding, presence, while being “just good enough,” and this is all the world asks from a search engine — no 100% relevancy, nothing else.

But that is not to say that all hope is lost for aspiring Google killers. I think if you can crack, firstly, 90%+ relevancy, and secondly, a user interface which is as close to what Google’s own was at its time, which says a lot seeing that it’s remained the same for 10 years, and if you can resist the temptation of a $100 million – $400 million buyout from Steve Ballmer, you may have something in your hands. And then, it would be a long wait — maybe years — till you can get even a fraction of the distribution and scaling that Google has, but after that, you will have a Google killer in your hands.

The chances of that happening of course is very unlikely. What is more likely is a growing pool of aspiring Google killers in the market, and, as a result, a growing pool of possible acquisitions for Microsoft to choose from. My prediction: Microsoft gobbles gobbles gobbles through this growing pool, and eventually Live Search is as good as Google’s, but distribution is yet to be cracked. In other words: Google remains king.

The Rev2 Cabinet: MixerCast

Ed Note: Apologies for the delay in getting this up — we’re scheduled for every Wednesday but it was completely my fault. Also, apologies for being post silent for the last three days. I’ll be back tomorrow for sure. Thanks!

The Rev2 Cabinet is a weekly investigative series at Rev2 where we take an in-depth look into some of the leading companies, startups, and services. Along with a podcast interview with our associate editor Zach Sims (embedded below and in the RSS feed), leading executives and CEOs offer insights into their startups and services which we analyze with an in-depth writeup. If you’re interested in being profiled, please contact Zach.

[audio:http://www.rev2.org/podcasts/Mixercast.mp3] [Download MP3] [24:36]

Online advertising is no joke. Recent estimates peg interactive ad revenues in 2007 at $25.5 billion, a 27% increase over 2006’s approximate MixerCast’s Jennifer Cooperrevenues. The quick moving segment currently makes up approximately 6.1% of the global ad market. An IDC report sees a general pattern that “companies are redistributing advertising dollars from traditional media to online media.” That trend is visible almost everywhere, and what really excites analysts are the prospects of the future. Kelsey Group analysts predict that interactive ad revenues will grow to $147 billion in 2012, and that interactive media will comprise 21% of the global media market.

As companies rush to get in on what is veritably the internet’s own gold rush, there have been winners and losers. Early on, it’s clear that Google is the commanding leader of search advertising, and the company’s AdWords and AdSense dominate contextual advertising. With control of more than 60% of the search market, Google has begun to assert their dominance over other areas, like video. Their $1.6 billion purchase of YouTube has brought them deeper into the video market and introduced a new advertising product for video. As the company grows, so do its ad initiatives. Despite its best efforts, the company’s market share of the advertising market dropped half a percentage point between 2007’s third and fourth quarter to 23.7%.

Google Ads for Digital Media.png

Google’s Famous Sponsored Links Beside a Search for “Digital Media”

Other companies, seeing unfilled niches and opportunities for innovation, have jumped to fill the void left by Google and its competitors. MixerCast was one of the first companies to fuse together the interactivity of the internet with advertising to create an entirely new field. I spoke with CEO Jen Cooper to learn more about the company.

Social Marketing Solutions

MixerCast has its hands in several different areas of media production, with tools for both the consumer and the enterprise client. In attempting to define the company’s aim to me, CEO Jen Cooper said that MixerCast was meant to help “publishers of digital content” in new innovative ways. She calls the new creations social marketing solutions. In a way, some of MixerCast’s consumer offerings compete with other slideshow creators like Slide and the previously interviewed RockYou. MixerCast’s core product is a widget canvas, allowing users to easily include media from dozens of websites in one easily embeddable object. For example, one could make a MixerCast pulling in photos from Flickr, videos from YouTube, and additional photos from MixerCast partner Getty Images, all synched to music from Pump Audio, another one of the company’s many partners.

Share a MixerCast.png

Scores of Options Are Offered for Sharing MixerCasts

The partnerships the company has truly set them apart from other widget producers. Their CEO, formerly of Yahoo! and a variety of other web companies, brought previous connections aboard to participate in MixerCast. Some of the more famous participating companies include National Geographic, Universal Music Group, Virgin Records, Warner Music, Warner Home Video, and more. These key partnerships allow consumer users to mix commercial content into something completely new. It’s not quite remixing the songs or pictures themselves, but it’s compiling them in new and different ways.

Starting Small

As with most companies, use cases determined the path of MixerCast. After a while, they discovered that it wasn’t just consumers using their terrific mashup tools. Instead, larger media companies had been using the tool to form interactive advertising campaigns. Noticing this, Cooper changed the company’s focus and began targeting larger advertising projects. The company is currently working with New Line Cinemas on Will Ferrell’s new movie, Semi-Pro. The MixerCast Semi-Pro widget, shown below, is an excellent example of the company’s future. It pulls together promotional content, like the official music video, with a new contest. Users download the music they need to make their own remixes from within the widget and then can re-upload their modified music video back through the widget. Those that interact with the widget can then view the submissions of others. All of this is contained within a large widget that can be easily embedded on dozens of different websites, all to promote the movie.

SemiPro Widget

MixerCast’s New Semi-Pro Widget, Produced in Coordination with New Line Cinemas

For this particular project, MixerCast worked together with New Line’s ad agency, who created the concept. MixerCast helped the agency to make the vision a reality, and the widget is now embedded on dozens of different social networks. As soon as a new video is uploaded, each of the widgets have access to the new content as well.

New Directions

A successful experience with New Line has provoked MixerCast to look into targeting “social marketing solutions” for the enterprise market as their number one area of business. They currently have “projects with every huge movie studio,” said their CEO. The widgets to come, promised Cooper, will be more advanced than what was seen early on with the Semi-Pro widget. Real time interaction is only the first step. She imagines MixerCast used with political campaigns as well as with the entertainment industry. A partnership with Entertainment Tonight has taken their widgets in another direction. The ET news widget brings the latest photos, text stories, and videos together in one cohesive widget experience that can be embedded on any website. The possibilities, emphasized Cooper, are endless. Users are often given the option to “remix” some of the established widgets to their own liking as well.

ET Widget.png

Entertainment Tonight’s MixerCast, Incorporating Photos, News, and Video

The company’s initial experiences have led them to place more effort into building the creative and advertising areas of the company. A new branch for creative engineers is being established during the first quarter in order to respond to the creative needs of the media companies working with MixerCast. The company’s current focus is on supplying solutions to these new enterprise clients. Normal consumers can still use the tools provided by MixerCast, and can insert advertisements into mixers in order to revenue share. The big change, however, will come with MixerCast’s redesign at the end of the first quarter. The goal of the project is to “make the experience easy to use” for every customer, and to make it “more distributable,” with new ways of tracking interactivity.

A Onetime Pioneer Prepares to Blaze Trails Again

Down the line, the company plans to have a fleshed out pipeline for new widgets and lots of deployments. Their virtual team, located around the world in India, Belarus, Minsk, and elsewhere, will continue to work on the product. The company’s CEO, Jen Cooper, was one of the first evangelizers of streaming media at VXtreme, a company later acquired by Microsoft and made part of Windows Media Player. With time as Yahoo’s Executive Director of Business Development, Cooper brings a wealth of experience to MixerCast. She’s been part of the first online video revolution, and I’m confident that MixerCast will be an integral part of the burgeoning field of interactive marketing and social marketing solutions.

The Rev2 Cabinet: Idée

The Rev2 Cabinet is a weekly investigative series at Rev2 where we take an in-depth look into some of the leading companies, startups, and services. Along with a podcast interview with our associate editor Zach Sims (embedded below and in the RSS feed), leading executives and CEOs offer insights into their startups and services which we analyze with an in-depth writeup. If you’re interested in being profiled, please contact Zach.

Most of the companies that get the most publicity are for personal use only. Yet others, whether theyIdee CEO Leila Boujnane appeal to the commercial market or something else, help to form the very backbone of the internet. Idée Inc. is one of these companies. Idée is a pioneer in the field of image recognition and visual search. The company’s two hallmark products, PixID and Piximilar, target different areas of the market while utilizing much of the same technology. Products still in Idée Labs are also intriguing. I spoke with Idée’s CEO and Co-Founder, Leila Boujnane, about the company.

A New Field

In 1999, Leila Boujnane and Paul Bloore founded Idée with a flagship product called Espion, a framework that still serves as the base technology for the company’s flagship products. At the time, watermarking by Digimarc was the common standard. The technology added a watermark to the image in the form of film grain or noise, and then allowed the image to be identified with that watermark. At the time, most other companies were preoccupied with the process of digitizing their photographs and did not think of tracking them. The founders of Idée saw an opportunity and eagerly sought to create a product that could track clients’ images both in print and online. They proposed a completely new system, utilizing a form of image recognition that’s vastly different from the watermarking used by Digimarc. The technology enabled the company to track pieces of the image, images that have had their color changed, and images with various other changes. Idée Co-Founder and CTO Paul Bloore has an excellent overview of the technology and its immense depth at the Idée website.

In our conversation, Leila emphasized that the key difference between Idée and its competitors was Idée’s ability to scale. The technology, she noted, is “quite simple,” but it’s the index speed that makes Idée superior to its rivals. Faster processing, indexing, and searching speeds have helped the company garner high profile clients. The visual search system, which by most accounts is extremely accurate, “can scale tremendously.” Leila noted that it’s designed “for millions of images,” which she sees as the “future of image searching scale.” Paul Bloore has claimed that Idée indexes millions of images throughout the internet to monitor for clients’ photos. Scalability becomes extremely important with numbers like that.

PixID Logo

After perfecting the original Espion technology, Idée formed the PixID product, used by many corporations around the world to track the use of their photos both in print and online. Leila sees image tracking as a field with “great potential,” and Idée has approached the market aggressively. Their largest clients, the Associated Press, Agence France-Presse, and Adobe, are some of the biggest names in their respective industries. After the rights holders upload their images to Idée, patterns are extracted from the image. Then, the patterns are compared to roughly 5000 publications and 200 million internet images. Finally, the company sends out automated reports to the Idée account each day to recount where the image has been spotted. The original and modified image are shown together, and the portion taken from the original image is highlighted. Additionally, PixID takes a screenshot of the webpage with the infringing photograph to preserve it.

Idee PixID Sample

A Match Found by PixID

Reports generated by PixID have a wide variety of uses, and allow users to track their images for billing, to track infringement, or for a variety of other purposes. Digg, the social news powerhouse, launched Digg Images with a partnership with Idée. Idée helps the company to identify duplicate images when they’re submitted. Just as with the company’s other visual search initiatives, it identifies images even if they’ve been modified.

Piximilar Logo

Piximilar Logo

Piximilar targets a different section of the market, providing “similar” images as opposed to finding those that are identical. If you’ve seen “Find similar images” buttons on websites, chances are Idée’s powering one of them. The service proves especially useful for stock photo sites. Masterfile, one such site, has integrated Idée’s Piximilar as SimSearch, allowing users to search their immense stock photo library for images similar in color, shape, theme, or a variety of other criteria. Fotofinder.net uses the idea as well, allowing users to mesh both “more like this” and textual search. Idée Labs hosts a bunch of other consumer oriented searches based on the Piximilar technology. The Multicolr app lets users search for Flickr pictures by clicking on a variety of colors they’d like to be included. Their visual search lab, meanwhile, lets you click a picture and find something similar, just as it’s implemented on stock photo sites. The best part, however, is the BYO Image Search Lab, which lets users upload their own photos and find pictures similar to it.

Piximilar

Similar Images Found With Piximilar

Fresh Ideas for a New Market

Idée is one of the industry leaders in the fields it currently is involved in with Piximilar and PixID. Those products, however, are aimed at a mainly enterprise-level audience. Idée Labs products like the BYO Image Search Lab mentioned above seem prime for the consumer market. Leila noted that Idée was exploring their options in the consumer field and would probably release a variation on their enterprise solutions for aspiring photographers. A hybrid between the BYO Image Search Lab and PixID would be perfect for semi-professional photographers and smaller companies who wanted to protect and license their images.

Leila also confirmed that Idée will be moving into the video market in the first quarter of 2008. As a logical expansion of their activities in the image realm, video features will operate in a similar manner to their image counterparts. “We have to continue to innovate,” said Leila, noting that there are “streams and streams of video” that Idée can be used with. The scale Idée currently can manage with photos will come in handy with video, a field which requires far more processing. Pilots are currently in progress with some of the company’s established clients.

Sound and text, meanwhile, are off limits to Idée. Those areas are “very different problems,” said Leila.

Unique

Idée’s comprehensive suite of photo tracking tools [and soon, video tracking tools] have not been matched by any competing product. I quizzed Leila on a bunch of potential competitors, including heavyweights like Google and Yahoo!. Those companies, she thought, were not threats because they “work in a specialized niche,” text searching. PicScout, meanwhile, tracks images like Idée but only in online mediums. It’s neither as comprehensive as Idée nor as well established. Attributor offers a service like Idée’s, but for text.

Like Visual Search

Refining Watch Choice by Visual at Riya’s Like.com

Riya launched to a lot of fanfare, and was called “the first true visual image search.” Originally centered around uploading photographs and autotagging faces, etc. the service has now transitioned most of its efforts to Like.com, a visual search engine for shopping. The service basically does what Idée’s Piximilar does, but for shoppers. Users can search using text, color, shape, pattern, and more to find the clothing item they desire. Leila saw a few critical disparities between Idée and Riya. Although they started with facial recognition, they have just moved into image search, and their searches do not, according to Leila, produce enough similar images. The issue Riya tackles with Like is a “very specific problem,” whereas Idée exists more as a software company for images. Idée licenses their technology to companies who themselves could, theoretically, create mashups similar to Like.com.

What’s Next?

Idée was a trailblazer in the field of image recognition, and they’d like to be recognized as such. They were the first to image tracking, and they’re racing to prepare for video tracking as well. Their entry into the consumer market will also be a big change for the company, but they have a solid platform to build upon. Leila told me that Idée strives to sit between “where content is produced and how it ends up being used.” The platform enables companies to collect sophisticated metrics as well, helping them to better target content production. Their roadmap for the future ensures that Idée will continue to be a pioneer in whatever field they choose, whether it’s video or images.

The Rev2 Cabinet: RockYou

The Rev2 Cabinet is a weekly investigative series at Rev2 where we take an in-depth look into some of the leading companies, startups, and services. Along with a podcast interview with our associate editor Zach Sims (embedded below and in the RSS feed), leading executives and CEOs offer insights into their startups and services which we analyze with an in-depth writeup. If you’re interested in being profiled, please contact Zach.

Podcast
Interview with Jia Shen, CTO of RockYou!
[audio:http://www.rev2.org/podcasts/RockYou.mp3] [Download MP3] [50:56]

Now, nearly every website you visit has a widget. Almost everything is embeddable, whether it’s the delegate count for the US presidential election from MSNBC, or something as mundane as a moving cat. It’s hard to argue that they have not been a large part of the explosive growth of viral videos, web games, and more. The pioneers in this field were Lance Tokuda and Jia Shen, the founders of RockYou! I spoke with Jia, currently the company’s CTO, in early June for our Facebook roundtable. We spoke again in December regarding RockYou’s latest growth announcement, in which they boasted that their company was finally the number one widget provider, as tracked by both Alexa and Facebook.

Pioneers Become Mainstays

“We are the leaders,” Jia confidently told me, and it seems as if that’s been the case since RockYou was founded. The slideshow application, easily one of the most used across the internet, was created first by RockYou. Since then, the company has blossomed out to create widgets in every conceivable category, from horoscopes and birthdays to voicemails and “audio accessories.” The growth in the number of widgets RockYou produces has led to an immense hike in the number of hits RockYou’s widgets receive. At last count, more than 130 million unique visitors interact with RockYou’s widgets per month. It’s those kind of numbers that have kept RockYou far ahead of its competition.

RockYouKanye.png

A RockYou Slideshow [Kanye West themed], One of the Company’s Original Offerings

Competition Heats Up

A market as lucrative as the one RockYou is in wasn’t likely to see no new entrants. So it was no surprise when Slide launched as direct competition to RockYou. Many of RockYou’s applications seem to be duplicated by Slide, but the numbers RockYou puts out are consistently better than Slide’s. However, that certainly doesn’t discount Slide, which has done its fair share of innovation and stuck out as RockYou’s lead partner. The competition between the two companies is so great that RockYou called particular attention to it in their press release, remarking that RockYou led all application developers “including Slide” in audience. Direct head-to-head competition, between apps like Super Wall and Fun Wall on Facebook, have usually gone RockYou’s way. Today, however, Facebook’s statistics tell a different story, with Slide’s Top Friends and Fun Wall coming in slightly higher than RockYou’s competing application.

SuperWall-1.jpg

RockYou’s Super Wall, the Company’s Most Popular Facebook Application

A Lucrative New Opportunity

RockYou made its name with embeds on popular social networking websites like MySpace, and throughout other websites. The launch of the much publicized Facebook Platform, however, was an incredible new opportunity for widget producers, and most hurried to launch new applications for users. The results have paid off for RockYou, as they now hold many of the top positions on Facebook. Jia highlighted a specific example for me. Their Super Wall application, which allows users to put graffiti on someone’s wall, is far more popular than the app named “graffiti.” I wrote about the “MySpace-ification” of Facebook earlier in 2007, and RockYou is largely to blame for trends like these. Yet, while I’m not such a fan of the clutter many of RockYou’s applications cause, they know their key demographic. Jia claims that RockYou’s widgets help users have “more self-expression” on Facebook and elsewhere. Teens have been fiendishly adding RockYou’s applications all over their profiles, and it’s difficult to browse Facebook without seeing at least one of RockYou’s applications. Partnerships with companies like SNOCAP have given RockYou users access to music and more in their widgets as well. Jia conceded that Facebook was the company’s number one priority at the moment, but that Google OpenSocial would also be something RockYou would use heavily.

HugMe.png

Just a Few of the Actions One Can Perform with RockYou’s “Hug Me” Facebook Application

More Than Widgets

It’s easy to generalize and say that widgets are all RockYou’s known for. Besides their exploits in the field of web widgets and Facebook applications, the company is responsible for a wildly successful Facebook advertising platform as well. While the focus is on app installs at the present, the ad network is a fairly large side project. One developer, said Jia, was making over $5,000 per day using RockYou’s ad network.

RockYouAds.png

Ads Like These, Inside the Facebook Apps of RockYou and Others, Have Propelled the Company to Advertising Dominance

Moving Forward

The company is, by all accounts, tremendously successful in most of what they do. Jia claimed that the company’s “reach” was their greatest success. RockYou currently reaches over 100 million people per month, and their staff is miniscule. The company is not content to remain one of the top widget providers, however. Instead, their aim is to be the top provider on every major social network, and to obtain penetration greater than 60%. Their next exploits may come in the fields of e-mail, messaging, and more. And, as they’re primarily focused on the “younger, most viral” demographic, I’m sure there are many of us that will pan their applications as useless. But whatever critics say, it seems like RockYou knows best. Their tremendous success, and their bright future, is enough to convince me that the company is well on its way to achieving the goal Jia laid out for me.

The Rev2 Cabinet: Zoho

 

The Rev2 Cabinet is a weekly investigative series at Rev2 where we take an in-depth look into some of the leading companies, startups, and services. Along with a podcast interview with our associate editor Zach Sims (embedded below and in the RSS feed), leading executives and CEOs offer insights into their startups and services which we analyze with an in-depth writeup. If you’re interested in being profiled, please contact Zach.

Podcast
Interview with Raju Vegesna, Chief Evangelist at Zoho
[audio:http://www.rev2.org/podcasts/Zoho.mp3] [Download MP3] [50:56]

Introduction
What does Zoho do? It’s certainly hard to define. No matter how they do it, they’re going about it differently than the majority of companies we write about today. For one, Zoho’s not even their own company. Instead, they’re a subsidiary of a larger, profitable company called AdventNet, which owns other web companies like ToonDoo. AdventNet, founded in 1996, works in the enterprise IT, networking, and telecom industries. In 2004, the company recognized the need for a transition to online applications and launched Zoho in September of 2005. Even though the company is a subsidiary of a far larger company, they act as though they are a startup. I spoke with Raju Vegesna, Zoho’s evangelist, about the company’s history and its future.

Raju Defined

Blown away by the diversity and depth of Zoho’s product line, I had to ask their evangelist, Raju, how he related Zoho to an audience of luddites. The pitch, he said, depended on the audience. Zoho’s wide range of services – including a word processor, a wiki creator, project management software, and more – appeals to a wide demographic. As such, Raju’s primary job is to “educate the market on web apps and collaboration.” From there, he could explain how Zoho fit into that niche.

Online Applications Defined

What, then, makes web apps better than a typical desktop application? In Raju’s mind, it’s as simple as the difference between a mobile phone and a telephone with a landline. With online applications, you can get access anywhere. That’s not the sole allure, however. Raju also noted that the invention of the mobile phone has brought new innovations, like cameras and the features that have come along with them. Before the invention of the mobile phone, photographs had to be given to friends or sent to them via mail. With cameraphones, users can simply click a button or two and the picture’s off to all of their best friends. Zoho brings similar innovations to the areas they work in. Sure, you can word process in both Zoho Writer and Microsoft Word, but Zoho gives you the ability to track your revisions and collaborate with others. Try doing that in Microsoft Word.

The Online/Offline Relationship

Still, not everyone’s ready to switch to online applications for all of their needs, even if the web apps can meet most of their requirements. It’s difficult to leave something you’ve relied on for years and to switch to something completely new and different. That’s evident in Google’s recent product announcement of Google Apps Team Edition. If a company’s not willing to adopt the new web tools that their employees are using, it’s easy enough for individuals within the company to adapt. Zoho, however, makes it much easier for prospective users to make the transition, whether within a large company or within their own house.

Two innovations, the Microsoft Office plugins and the Desktopize software for Zoho, make the jump from offline to online easier than ever. The Microsoft Office plugin, released by Zoho in November of 2006 to widespread approval, helps to make Zoho a storage space for users’ Microsoft Office documents. With the plugin, users can create documents in Microsoft Word or Excel and save them directly to Zoho, while saving an offline local copy if they wish. Additionally, users can edit documents that were started on Zoho within Microsoft Word. This update makes it effortless for users to finally combine what they’ve known with the revolutions of Web 2.0. When you’re at your home computer, you can use Microsoft Word to work on your documents. If you’re away from home, it’s as easy as signing into Zoho. Desktopize helped to create a single site browser like Mozilla Prism for the Zoho web apps. It minimizes to the system tray and acts as if it were a full office suite.

officezoho.jpg

Opening a Zoho Document in Microsoft Word

Zoho’s also one of the company’s that has used Google Gears to make Zoho work offline in the Firefox browser. They beat Google to the punch, and in my experience, using Zoho offline is rather simple. While not as easy and accessible as the Microsoft Office plugin, it’s certainly another way to access a terrific online word processor when the internet is not available. Zoho has differentiated themselves from the pack by allowing users to edit their documents offline, a crucial distinction from the offerings of other companies which simply allow users to read their documents offline.

Raju called it “backwards compatibility,” noting that Zoho can’t leave its less tech savvy users in the cold. Still, he notes, the focus is on converting them to the online application. Raju described the distribution of Zoho’s efforts as 80% online and 20% offline. For a company that’s only putting 20% into their offline efforts, they’ve done some tremendous things for offline users. Their Microsoft Office plugin, the Desktopize browser, and the functionality with Google Gears make Zoho’s offline offering nearly as formidable as their online one. After all, said Raju, Zoho is “here for the long haul” and cannot afford to alienate any user base.

An Online Office? Not Quite…

Zoho does replace typical Microsoft Office products like Word and Excel. As I mentioned earlier, however, Zoho brings lots of new features to the table. In their traditional products, like Zoho Writer and Zoho Sheet, the company adds online collaboration like competitors Google Docs and Buzzword. Version tracking is included as well. Pagination is a new feature that Google Docs doesn’t include, and the easy Zoho Start page is a good way to edit documents with a tabbed interface. Raju conceded that Google Docs offered simplicity, but he claimed that’s not what he was after. Instead, Zoho beats Google’s offerings in both breadth and depth. They offer more, and each of their applications includes more features. Switching to Zoho seems like a no brainer for me, and Zoho says that’s been the typical trend they’ve seen. Users typically find Zoho after experiencing something like Google Docs. Finding more features and more applications, they settle on Zoho.

Zoho Start.jpg

Zoho Start, the homepage for all of Zoho’s apps

A good outline of Zoho’s offerings is available on their homepage, but it’s worth noting the sheer number of products Zoho’s working on. Some of their products, like Zoho Projects and Zoho Planner seem to compete directly with offers from the famed 37Signals, makers of collaboration and personal organization services Backpack and Basecamp. Among Zoho’s other offerings are Zoho Mail (a collaborative mail product), Zoho DB (an online database product), Zoho Meeting (Desktop Sharing & Web Conferencing), Zoho Chat, Zoho Notebook, and Zoho Wiki.

Ease of Use

Much has been said across the web about the Zoho suite, and we’re not the first to praise the service for its usability. I’ve used lots of competing services, like Buzzword and Google Docs. To me, Zoho is the more businesslike environment for word processors on the internet, and that’s advantageous. It’ll be easier for those who are looking for features, not good looks, to adapt. I absolutely loved the writing atmosphere in Buzzword when I tried it out, and Zoho Writer is far more sterile. Still, it provides more tools than Buzzword and, for those looking for more than a simple word process, is a much better option. As far as I’ve seen, Zoho is the only word processor that truly encompasses most of Microsoft’s features and should make it easy enough for typical users of MS Word to adapt to an online word processor.

Zoho Writer.jpg

Zoho Writer’s Interface

“Google is the best thing that happened to Zoho.” Wait, what?

I asked Raju about the fierce competition the company’s facing. Online offices are a dime a dozen nowadays, and competition’s heating up. Adobe just bought the Buzzword word processor (as part of a deal for Virtual Ubiquity), and other large companies like Google continue to add more features and applications. Why is it, then, that Raju sees Google, one of its biggest competitors, as “the best thing that ever happened to Zoho.” Before their entrance into the market, contended Raju, the online office market was simply a bunch of small players. As soon as Google entered the market, it was a recognition of the importance of the online office. As Raju told me, users may find Google Docs first, but when they search for a more diverse and full office experience, they will settle on Zoho.

Getting Down to Business

Zoho’s key demographic is small and medium businesses. The focus on this group is so great that Raju claims that Zoho’s ultimate goal is to “be the IT department for small and medium business.” Zoho’s products are designed for small and medium businesses, whereas Google’s are designed to be deployed by much larger entities. The different routes taken by the two companies could enable Zoho to triumph in their own demographic. Even in a head-to-head with Google, Zoho may have the upper hand. Raju’s estimates claim that Zoho has 20-30% more features than Google and 40-50% more applications than the search giant.

Zoho Business.jpg

Zoho Business’ Beta Homepage

In response to the greater demand for a business-centric offering, Zoho has launched a for-pay program called Zoho Business. The core Zoho products remain free for users to use on a personal level. The new Business service, meanwhile, makes it easier to manage domains, users, and more, while deploying Zoho’s terrific set of tools.

Zoho’s Education

Zoho’s focus on business doesn’t mean there isn’t attention placed anywhere else. After all, Raju said that anywhere from 30-40% of Zoho’s users are students. Later this year, Zoho plans to launch a Zoho Education service. Zoho seems to have realized many of the tech problems that 21st century students face, and has a good grip on how to attack them. Only a few of the apps will make their way into Zoho Education, but new tools are supposed to accompany them. For one, students will be able to submit their homework to teachers. Zoho Education may be a few months off, but when it arrives I’m sure it’ll have a large impact on the sorely lacking education technology industry.

What’s Next?

Zoho’s done an incredible amount in its short history. Much of this is due to effective business practices. While the company isn’t profitable yet, it has the support of a far larger corporation, AdventNet, which gives it the ability to pursue whichever direction it chooses without interference. Zoho, which has many engineers in India, has a separate team that works on each application. Raju claims that the focus is for each individual team to “be the best in their category.” It’s been difficult for us to keep up with Zoho because of the incredible number of updates the company puts out. The Zoho Blogs are a great place to keep track of what the company’s thinking, along with the frequent updates.

zohoiPhone.jpg

Zoho’s iPhone Interface

Zoho is miles away from the competition. They’ve created a mobile interface for Zoho Creator, and iPhone users can use a nifty interface to read their Zoho docs on-the-go. There’s no interaction available for those documents yet, but Zoho plans to enable users to write from their iPhones in the near future. Zoho’s Facebook application may take the fun out of Facebook, but it’s there as a productivity option for those who want an office within Facebook. I think it’s a valuable tool that actually adds some productivity value to Facebook.

Raju said Zoho loves feedback. I’d give them some suggestions, but I find that there’s so little not to like, and so much to like that it’s hard to come up with anything. In concluding our phone call, Raju told our users to “give Zoho a try.” If you do, I know you won’t be disappointed.